Most Websites Can Not (and Often Should Not) Use Accessibility Standards- That’s Where We Come In.
Websites can not be accessibility compliant without sacrificing design, interactivity and general user experience for visitors without disabilities (paying 50% more for designers and coders might help, but would still fall short). Those with challenges using websites require alternative web pages.
Many of the most important pages on the web would lose their pleasing design and interactivity if they had to be accessible compliant. The article “Web accessibility” on Wikipedia, for example, has 120 errors. Wikipedia would have to change the entire framework of their site to make this page accessible. In doing so they’d have to train their entire staff of contributors on in depth accessibility practices.
Wikipedia is not an outlier. CNN, a company with very different staffing and financial resources, is inaccessible to many millions of people. They have over 130 errors on typical pages. Amazon.com has over 57 on their homepage.
What We Do
We create accessible alternatives of articles which don’t meet WC3 requirements.
We offer free resources to webmasters who want to improve accessibility.
Most importantly, we do all our work with love. We Care.