What is Dyslexia

Note: If you or someone you know has dyslexia, please consider downloading OpenDyslexic: an open source font created to increase readability for those with dyslexia. The typeface includes regular, bold, italic, and bold-italic styles. It is being updated continually and improved based on input from dyslexic users.

 

Dyslexia, also known as reading disorder, is characterized by trouble with reading despite normal intelligence.[2][7] Different people are affected to varying degrees.[4] Problems may include difficulties in spelling words, reading quickly, writing words, “sounding out” words in the head, pronouncing words when reading aloud and understanding what one reads.[4][8] Often these difficulties are first noticed at school.[3] When someone who previously could read loses their ability, it is known as alexia.[4] The difficulties are involuntary and people with this disorder have a normal desire to learn.[4]

Dyslexia is believed to be caused by both genetic and environmental factors.[3] Some cases run in families.[4] It often occurs in people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and is associated with similar difficulties with numbers.[3] It may begin in adulthood as the result of a traumatic brain injurystroke, or dementia.[2] The underlying mechanisms of dyslexia are problems within the brain‘s language processing.[4] Dyslexia is diagnosed through a series of tests of memory, spelling, vision, and reading skills.[5] Dyslexia is separate from reading difficulties caused by hearing or vision problems or by insufficient teaching.[3]

Treatment involves adjusting teaching methods to meet the person’s needs.[2] While not curing the underlying problem, it may decrease the degree of symptoms.[9] Treatments targeting vision are not effective.[10] Dyslexia is the most common learning disability and occurs in all areas of the world.[3][11] It affects 3–7% of the population,[3][6] however, up to 20% may have some degree of symptoms.[12] While dyslexia is more often diagnosed in men,[3] it has been suggested that it affects men and women equally.[11] Some believe that dyslexia should be best considered as a different way of learning, with both benefits and downsides.[13][14]

Classification

Dyslexia is thought to have two types of cause, one related to language processing and another to visual processing.[15] It is considered a cognitive disorder, not a problem with intelligence. However, emotional problems often arise because of it.[15] Some published definitions are purely descriptive, whereas others propose causes. The latter usually cover a variety of reading skills and deficits, and difficulties with distinct causes rather than a single condition.[16] The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke definition describes dyslexia as “difficulty with phonological processing (the manipulation of sounds), spelling, and/or rapid visual-verbal responding”.[2] The British Dyslexia Association definition describes dyslexia as “a learning difficulty that primarily affects the skills involved in accurate and fluent word reading and spelling” and is characterized by “difficulties in phonological awareness, verbal memory and verbal processing speed”.[17]

Acquired dyslexia or alexia may be caused by brain damage due to stroke or atrophy.[18][19] Forms of alexia include pure alexiasurface dyslexiasemantic dyslexiaphonological dyslexia, and deep dyslexia.[20]

Definition

There is some variability in the definition of dyslexia. Some sources, such as the U.S. National Institutes of Health, define it specifically as a learning disorder.[2] Other sources, however, define it simply as an inability to read in the context of normal intelligence, and distinguish between developmental dyslexia (a learning disorder) and acquired dyslexia (loss of the ability to read caused by brain damage). ICD 10, the manual of medical diagnosis used in much of the world, includes separate diagnoses for “developmental dyslexia” (81.0)[21] and for “dyslexia and alexia” (48.0).[22]DSM 5, the manual of psychiatric diagnosis used in the United States, does not specifically define dyslexia, justifying this decision by stating that “the many definitions of dyslexia and dyscalculia meant those terms would not be useful as disorder names or in the diagnostic criteria”. Instead it includes dyslexia in a category called specific learning disorders.[23]

Signs and symptoms

In early childhood, symptoms that correlate with a later diagnosis of dyslexia include delayed onset of speech, difficulty distinguishing left from right, difficulty with direction,[24] and a lack of phonological awareness, as well as being easily distracted by background noise.[10] A common myth closely associates dyslexia with mirror writing and reading letters or words backwards.[25] These behaviors are seen in many children as they learn to read and write, and are not considered to be defining characteristics of dyslexia.[10]

School-age children with dyslexia may exhibit signs of difficulty in identifying or generating rhyming words, or counting the number of syllables in words – both of which depend on phonological awareness.[26] They may also show difficulty in segmenting words into individual sounds or may blend sounds when producing words, indicating reduced phonemic awareness.[27] Difficulties with word retrieval or naming things is also associated with dyslexia.[28]:647 People with dyslexia are commonly poor spellers, a feature sometimes called dysorthographia or dysgraphia, which depends on orthographic coding.[10]

Problems persist into adolescence and adulthood and may accompany difficulties with summarizing stories, memorization, reading aloud, or learning foreign languages. Adults with dyslexia can often read with good comprehension, though they tend to read more slowly than others without a learning difficulty and perform worse in spelling tests or when reading nonsense words – a measure of phonological awareness.[29]

Language

The orthographic complexity of a language directly impacts how difficult learning to read the language is.[30]:266 English and French have comparatively “deep” phonemic orthographies within the Latin alphabetwriting system, with complex structures employing spelling patterns on several levels: letter-sound correspondence, syllables, and morphemes.[31]:421 Languages such as Spanish, Italian and Finnish have mostly alphabetic orthographies, which primarily employ letter-sound correspondence – so-called shallow orthographies – which for dyslexics makes them easier to learn.[30]:266Logographic writing systems, such as Chinese characters, have extensive symbol use, and pose problems for dyslexic learners.[32]

Associated conditions

Dyslexia is often accompanied by several learning disabilities, but it is unclear whether they share underlying neurological causes.[33] These associated disabilities include:

  • Dysgraphia – A disorder which primarily expresses itself through difficulties with writing or typing, but in some cases through difficulties associated with eye–hand coordinationand direction or sequence-oriented processes such as tying knots or carrying out repetitive tasks.[34] In dyslexia, dysgraphia is often multifactorial, due to impaired letter-writing automaticity, organizational and elaborative difficulties, and impaired visual word forming which makes it more difficult to retrieve the visual picture of words required for spelling.[34]
  • Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) – A disorder characterized by problems paying attention, excessive activity, or taking action without forethought.[35] Dyslexia and ADHD commonly occur together.[6][36][37] Either 15%[10] or 12–24% of people with dyslexia have ADHD.[38] 35% of people with ADHD have dyslexia.[10]
  • Auditory processing disorder – A listening disability that affects the ability to process auditory information.[39][40] This can lead to problems with auditory memory and auditory sequencing. Many people with dyslexia have auditory processing problems, and may develop their own logographic cues to compensate for this type of deficit. Some research indicates that auditory processing skills could be the primary shortfall in dyslexia.[41][42]
  • Developmental coordination disorder – A neurological condition characterized by marked difficulty in carrying out routine tasks involving balance, fine-motor controlkinestheticcoordination, difficulty in the use of speech sounds, problems with short-term memory, and organization.[43]

Causes

Researchers have been trying to find the neurobiological basis of dyslexia since the condition was first identified in 1881.[44][45]For example, some have tried to associate the common problem among dyslexics of not being able to see letters clearly to abnormal development of their visual nerve cells.[46]

Inferior parietal lobule (superior view). Some dyslexics demonstrate less electrical activation in this area.

 

Neuroanatomy

Modern neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography(PET) have shown a correlation between both functional and structural differences in the brains of children with reading difficulties.[47] Some dyslexics show less electrical activation in parts of the left hemisphere of the brain involved with reading, such as the inferior frontal gyrusinferior parietal lobule, and the middle and ventral temporal cortex.[41] Over the past decade, brain activation studies using PET to study language have produced a breakthrough in the understanding of the neural basis of language. Neural bases for the visual lexicon and for auditory verbal short-term memory components have been proposed,[48]with some implication that the observed neural manifestation of developmental dyslexia is task-specific (i.e. functional rather than structural). fMRIs in dyslexics have provided important data which point to the interactive role of the cerebellum and cerebral cortex as well as other brain structures.[49][50]

The cerebellar theory of dyslexia proposes that impairment of cerebellum-controlled muscle movement affects the formation of words by the tongue and facial muscles, resulting in the fluency problems that are characteristic of some dyslexics. The cerebellum is also involved in the automatization of some tasks, such as reading.[51] The fact that some dyslexic children have motor task and balance impairments has been used as evidence for a cerebellar role in their reading difficulties. However, the cerebellar theory is not supported by controlled research studies.[52]

Genetics

Research into potential genetic causes of dyslexia has its roots in post-autopsy examination of the brains of people with dyslexia.[46] Observed anatomical differences in the language centers of such brains include microscopic cortical malformations known as ectopias, more rarely, vascular micro-malformations, and microgyrus.[53] The previously cited studies and others[54] suggest that abnormal cortical development presumed to occur before or during the sixth month of fetal brain development was the cause of the abnormalities. Abnormal cell formations in dyslexics have also been reported in non-language cerebral and subcortical brain structures.[55] Several genes have been associated with dyslexia, including DCDC2 and KIAA0319 on chromosome 6,[56] and DYX1C1 on chromosome 15.[57]

Gene–environment interaction

The contribution of gene–environment interaction to reading disability has been intensely studied using twin studies, which estimate the proportion of variance associated with a person’s environment and the proportion associated with their genes. Studies examining the influence of environmental factors such as parental education[58] and teacher quality[59]have determined that genetics have greater influence in supportive, rather than less optimal, environments.[60] However, more optimal conditions may just allow those genetic risk factors to account for more of the variance in outcome because the environmental risk factors have been minimized.[60] As environment plays a large role in learning and memory, it is likely that epigenetic modifications play an important role in reading ability. Animal experiments and measures of gene expression and methylation in the human periphery are used to study epigenetic processes; however, both types of study have many limitations in the extrapolation of results for application to the human brain.[61]

Mechanisms

The dual-route theory of reading aloud was first described in the early 1970s.[62] This theory suggests that two separate mental mechanisms, or cognitive routes, are involved in reading aloud.[63] One mechanism is the lexical route, which is the process whereby skilled readers can recognize known words by sight alone, through a “dictionary” lookup procedure.[64] The other mechanism is the nonlexical or sublexical route, which is the process whereby the reader can “sound out” a written word.[64][65] This is done by identifying the word’s constituent parts (letters, phonemesgraphemes) and applying knowledge of how these parts are associated with each other, for example, how a string of neighboring letters sound together.[62] The dual-route system could explain the different rates of dyslexia occurrence between different languages (e.g. the Spanish language dependence on phonological rules accounts for the fact that Spanish-speaking children show a higher level of performance in non-word reading, when compared to English-speakers).[30][66]

Dyslexia disorder is not caused by mutation in one gene; in fact, it appears to involve the combined effects of several genes. Studying the cognitive problems associated with other disorders helps to better understand the genotype-phenotype link of dyslexia.[67] Neurophysiological and imaging procedures are being used to ascertain phenotypic characteristics in dyslexics, thus identifying the effects of certain genes.[68]

Diagnosis

There are tests that can indicate with high probability whether a person is a dyslexic.[69] If diagnostic testing indicates that a person may be dyslexic, such tests are often followed up with a full diagnostic assessment to determine the extent and nature of the disorder.[70] Tests can be administered by a teacher or computer.[71] Some test results indicate how to carry out teaching strategies.[71][72]

Central dyslexias

Central dyslexias include surface dyslexiasemantic dyslexiaphonological dyslexia, and deep dyslexia.[18][73]ICD-10 reclassified the previous distinction between dyslexia (315.02 in ICD-9) and alexia (315.01 in ICD-9) into a single classification as R48.0. The terms are applied to developmental dyslexia and inherited dyslexia along with developmental aphasia and inherited alexia, which are considered synonymous.[74]

Surface dyslexia

In surface dyslexia, words with regular pronunciations (highly consistent with their spelling, e.g. mint) are read more accurately than words with irregular pronunciation, such as colonel.[75] Difficulty distinguishing homophones is a diagnostic used for some forms of surface dyslexia. This disorder is usually accompanied by surface agraphia and fluent aphasia.[76] Acquired surface dyslexia arises when a previously literate person experiences brain damage, which results in pronunciation errors that indicate impairment of the lexical route.[18][77][78]

Phonological dyslexia

In phonological dyslexia, sufferers can read familiar words but have difficulty with unfamiliar words, such as invented pseudo-words.[80]Phonological dyslexia is associated with lesions in the parts of the brain supplied with blood by the middle cerebral artery. The superior temporal lobe is often also involved. Furthermore, dyslexics compensate by overusing a front-brain region called Broca’s area, which is associated with aspects of language and speech.[81] The Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing Program (LiPS) is used to treat phonological dyslexia.[82] This system is based on a three-way sensory feedback process, using auditory, visual, and oral skills to learn to recognize words and word patterns. Case studies with a total of three patients found a significant improvement in spelling and reading ability after using LiPS.[83]

Broca’s area – (lateral view) dyslexics overuse this area which is associated with speech.

Deep dyslexia

Individuals with deep dyslexia experience both semantic paralexia (para-dyslexia) and phonological dyslexia, which causes the person to read a word and then say a related meaning instead of the denoted meaning.[84] Deep alexia is associated with clear phonological processing impairments.[18] Deep dyslexia is caused by widespread damage to the brain that often includes the left hemisphere.[85] The “continuum” hypothesis claims that deep dyslexia develops from phonological dyslexia.[86]

Peripheral dyslexias

Peripheral dyslexias have been described as affecting the visual analysis of letters as a result of brain injury.[87]Hemianopsia, a visual field loss on the left/right side of the vertical midline, is associated with this condition.[88][89]

Pure dyslexia

Pure, or phonologically-based,[90] dyslexia, also known as agnosic dyslexia, dyslexia without agraphia, and pure word blindness, is dyslexia due to difficulty in recognizing written sequences of letters (such as words), or sometimes even letters. It is considered ‘”pure” because it is not accompanied by other significant language-related impairments. Pure dyslexia does not affect speech, handwriting style, language or comprehension impairments.[91] Pure dyslexia is caused by lesions on the visual word form area (VWFA). The VWFA is composed of the left lateral occipital sulcus and is activated during reading. A lesion in the VWFA stops transmission between the visual cortex and the left angular gyrus. It can also be caused by a lesion involving the left occipital lobe or the splenium. It is usually accompanied by a homonymous hemianopsia in the right side of the visual field.[87] Multiple oral re-reading (MOR) is a treatment for pure dyslexia.[92] It is considered a top-down processing technique in which affected individuals read and reread texts a predetermined number of times or until reading speed or accuracy improves a predetermined amount.[93]

Hemianopic dyslexia

Hemianopic dyslexia is commonly considered to derive from visual field loss due to damage to the primary visual cortex.[94] Sufferers may complain of abnormally slow reading but are able to read individual words normally. This is the most common form of peripheral alexia, and the form with the best evidence of effective treatments.[95]

Neglect dyslexia

In neglect dyslexia, some letters, most commonly those at the beginning or left side of a word, are skipped or misread during reading.[96] This alexia is associated with right parietal lesions. The use of prism glasses has been shown to substantially mitigate this condition.[97]

Attentional dyslexia

People with attentional dyslexia complain of letter-crowding or migration, sometimes blending elements of two words into one.[98] Sufferers read better when words are presented in isolation rather than flanked by other words and letters. Using a large magnifying glass may help mitigate this condition by reducing the effects of flanking from nearby words; however, no trials of this or indeed any other therapy for left parietal syndromes have been published as of 2014.[99]

Management

Through the use of compensation strategies, therapy and educational support, dyslexic individuals can learn to read and write.[100] There are techniques and technical aids which help to manage or conceal symptoms of the disorder.[101] Removing stress and anxiety alone can sometimes improve written comprehension.[102] For dyslexia intervention with alphabet-writing systems, the fundamental aim is to increase a child’s awareness of correspondences between graphemes (letters) and phonemes (sounds), and to relate these to reading and spelling by teaching how sounds blend into words. It has been found that reinforced collateral training focused on reading and spelling yields longer-lasting gains than oral phonological training alone.[103] Early intervention that is done for children at a young age can be successful in reducing reading failure.[104]

There is some evidence that the use of specially-tailored fonts may help with dyslexia.[1] These fonts, which include DyslexieOpenDyslexic, and Lexia Readable, were created based on the idea that many of the letters of the Latin alphabet are visually similar and may, therefore, confuse people with dyslexia. Dyslexie and OpenDyslexic both put emphasis on making each letter more distinctive in order to be more easily identified.[105] The benefits, however, might simply be due to the added spacing between words.[106]

There have been many studies conducted regarding intervention in dyslexia. Among these studies one meta-analysis found that there was functional activation as a result.[107]

There is no evidence demonstrating that the use of music education is effective in improving dyslexic adolescents’ reading skills.[108]

Prognosis

Dyslexic children require special instruction for word analysis and spelling from an early age.[109] While there are fonts that may help people with dyslexia better understand writing, this might simply be due to the added spacing between words.[1][106] The prognosis, generally speaking, is positive for individuals who are identified in childhood and receive support from friends and family.[2]

Epidemiology

The percentage of people with dyslexia is unknown, but it has been estimated to be as low as 5% and as high as 17% of the population.[111] While it is diagnosed more often in males,[3] some believe that it affects males and females equally.

There are different definitions of dyslexia used throughout the world, but despite significant differences in writing systems, dyslexia occurs in different populations.[112] Dyslexia is not limited to difficulty in converting letters to sounds, and Chinese dyslexics may have difficulty converting Chinese characters into their meanings.[113][114] The Chinese vocabulary uses logographic, monographic, non-alphabet writing where one character can represent an individual phoneme.[115]

The phonological-processing hypothesis attempts to explain why dyslexia occurs in a wide variety of languages. Furthermore, the relationship between phonological capacity and reading appears to be influenced by orthography.[116] 

– Alphabet (consonants and vowels)
– Abjad (only consonants)
– Abugida (family-related syllables)
– Logograms
– Syllabary (isolated syllables)

History

Dyslexia was identified by Oswald Berkhan in 1881,[44] but the term dyslexia was coined in 1887 by Rudolf Berlin, an ophthalmologist in Stuttgart.[117] He used the term to refer to the case of a young boy who had a severe impairment in learning to read and write, despite showing typical intelligence and physical abilities in all other respects.[118] In 1896, W. Pringle Morgan, a British physician from Seaford, East Sussex, published a description of a reading-specific learning disorder in a report to the British Medical Journal titled “Congenital Word Blindness”.[119] The distinction between phonological and surface types of dyslexia is only descriptive, and without any etiological assumption as to the underlying brain mechanisms. However, studies have alluded to potential differences due to variation in performance.[120]

Research and society

The majority of currently available dyslexia research relates to alphabetic writing systems, and especially to European languages.[121] However, substantial research is also available regarding dyslexics who speak Arabic, Chinese, Hebrew, or other languages.[122]

As is the case with any disorder, society often makes an assessment based on incomplete information. Before the 1980s, dyslexia was thought to be a consequence of education, rather than a basic disability. As a result, society often misjudges those with the disorder.[102] There is also sometimes a workplace stigma and negative attitude towards those with dyslexia.[123] If a dyslexic’s instructors lack the necessary training to support a child with the condition, there is often a negative effect on the student’s learning participation.[124]

See also

 

About this article

Dyslexia,” was published on wikipedia.com, and is shown here in it’s original form.  However, this version is designed for WC3, accessibility compliance.

References

  1.  de Leeuw, Renske (December 2010). “Special Font For Dyslexia?” (PDF) (in English and Dutch). University of Twente: 32. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 November 2011.
  2.  “NINDS Dyslexia Information Page”National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. National Institutes of Health. 11 September 2015. Archived from the original on 27 July 2016. Retrieved 27 July 2016.
  3.  Peterson, RL; Pennington, BF (26 May 2012). “Developmental dyslexia” (PDF). Lancet379 (9830): 1997–2007. PMC 3465717Freely accessiblePMID 22513218doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60198-6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2015.
  4.  “What are reading disorders?”. National Institutes of Health. Archivedfrom the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 15 March 2015.
  5.  “How are reading disorders diagnosed?”. National Institutes of Health. Archivedfrom the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 15 March 2015.
  6.  Kooij, J. J. Sandra (2013). Adult ADHD diagnostic assessment and treatment (3rd ed.). London: Springer. p. 83. ISBN 9781447141389Archived from the original on 30 April 2016.
  7.  Siegel, LS (November 2006). “Perspectives on dyslexia”Paediatrics & child health11(9): 581–7. PMC 2528651Freely accessiblePMID 19030329.
  8. “What are the symptoms of reading disorders?”. National Institutes of Health. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 15 March 2015.
  9.  “What are common treatments for reading disorders?”. National Institutes of Health. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 15 March 2015.
  10. Handler, SM; Fierson, WM; Section on, Ophthalmology; Council on Children with, Disabilities; American Academy of, Ophthalmology; American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and, Strabismus; American Association of Certified, Orthoptists (March 2011). “Learning disabilities, dyslexia, and vision.”. Pediatrics127 (3): e818–56. PMID 21357342doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3670.
  11. Umphred, Darcy Ann; Lazaro, Rolando T.; Roller, Margaret; Burton, Gordon (2013). Neurological Rehabilitation. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 383. ISBN 978-0-323-26649-9Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  12.  “How many people are affected by/at risk for reading disorders?”. National Institutes of Health. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 15 March 2015.
  13. Venton, Danielle (September 2011). “The Unappreciated Benefits of Dyslexia”Wired.com. Wired. Archived from the original on 5 August 2016. Retrieved 10 August2016.
  14. Mathew, Schneps (August 2014). “The Advantages of Dyslexia”ScientificAmerican.com. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 4 August 2016. Retrieved 10 August 2016.
  15.  Campbell, Robert Jean (2009). Campbell’s Psychiatric Dictionary. Oxford University Press. pp. 310–312. ISBN 978-0-19-534159-1Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  16. Lyytinen, Heikki (November 2009). “In Search of a Science Based Application:Learning Tool for Reading Acquisition”. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology50 (6): 668–675. PMID 19930268doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00791.x.
  17.  Phillips, Sylvia; Kelly, Kathleen; Symes, Liz (2013). Assessment of Learners with Dyslexic-Type Difficulties. SAGE. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-4462-8704-0Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  18. Woollams, Anna M. (9 December 2013). “Connectionist neuropsychology: uncovering ultimate causes of acquired dyslexia”Philosophical Translations of the Royal Society of London; Series B, Biological Sciences369 (1634): 20120398. PMC 3866427Freely accessiblePMID 24324241doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0398Archived from the original on 5 October 2015. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
  19. Heilman, Kenneth M.; Valenstein, Edward (2011). Clinical Neuropsychology. Oxford University Press. pp. 115–116. ISBN 978-0-19-538487-1Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  20. Spivey, Michael; Joanisse, Marc; McRae, Ken (2012). The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 219–220. ISBN 978-0-521-67792-9Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  21. “ICD-10 Version:2015”apps.who.intArchived from the original on 2 November 2015. Retrieved 4 November 2015.
  22.  “ICD-10 Version:2015”apps.who.intArchived from the original on 2 November 2015. Retrieved 4 November 2015.
  23.  “Specific learning disorders” (PDF). American Psychiatric Publishing. 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 6 November 2015.
  24.  Hamada, Hiroshi; Tam, Patrick P.L. (December 2014). “Mechanisms of left-right asymmetry and patterning: driver, mediator and responder”F1000 Prime Reports6: 110. PMC 4275019Freely accessiblePMID 25580264doi:10.12703/P6-110.
  25.  Lilienfeld, Scott O.; Lynn, Steven Jay; Ruscio, John; Beyerstein, Barry L. (15 September 2011). 50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology: Shattering Widespread Misconceptions about Human Behavior. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 88–89. ISBN 978-1-4443-6074-5Archivedfrom the original on 9 January 2017. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
  26.  “Dyslexia and Related Disorders” (PDF). Alabama Dyslexia AssociationInternational Dyslexia Association. January 2003. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 29 April 2015.
  27.  Peer, Lindsay; Reid, Gavin (2014). Multilingualism, Literacy and Dyslexia. Routledge. p. 219. ISBN 978-1-136-60899-5Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  28.  Shaywitz, Sally E.; Shaywitz, Bennett A. (2013). “Chapter 34 Making a Hidden Disability Visible: What Has Been Learned from Neurobiological Studies of Dyslexia”. In Swanson, H. Lee; Harris, Karen R.; Graham, Steve. Handbook of Learning Disabilities (2 ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1-4625-0856-3Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  29.  Jarrad, Lum (October 2013). “Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies”Research of Developmental Disabilities34(10): 3460–76. PMC 3784964Freely accessiblePMID 23920029doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017.
  30. Paulesu, Eraldo; Brunswick, Nicola and Paganelli, Federica (2010). “Cross-cultural differences in unimpaired and dyslexic reading: Behavioral and functional anatomical observations in readers of regular and irregular orthographies. Chapter 12 in Reading and Dyslexia in Different Orthographies Archived 9 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine.. Eds. Nicola Brunswick, Siné McDougall, and Paul de Mornay Davies. Psychology Press. ISBN 9781135167813
  31.  Juel, Connie (2013). “The Impact of Early School Experiences on Initial Reading”. In David K. Dickinson; Susan B. Neuman. Handbook of Early Literacy Research. Guilford Publications. ISBN 978-1-4625-1470-0Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  32. Snowling, Margaret J; Hulme, Charles (1 May 2012). “Annual Research Review: The nature and classification of reading disorders – a commentary on proposals for DSM-5”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines53 (5): 593–607. PMC 3492851Freely accessiblePMID 22141434doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02495.x.
  33. Nicolson, R. I.; Fawcett, A. J. (September 2009). “Dyslexia, dysgraphia, procedural learning and the cerebellum”. Cortex47 (1): 117–27. PMID 19818437doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.016. – via ScienceDirect (Subscription may be required or content may be available in libraries.)
  34. Reynolds, Cecil R.; Fletcher-Janzen, Elaine (2 January 2007). Encyclopedia of Special Education. John Wiley & Sons. p. 771ISBN 978-0-471-67798-7.
  35.  “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder”NIH: National Institute of Mental Health. March 2016. Archived from the original on 23 July 2016. Retrieved 26 July 2016.
  36.  Comer, Ronald (2011). Psychology Around Us. RR Donnelley. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-471-38519-6Archived from the original on 4 June 2016.
  37.  Germanò, E; Gagliano, A; Curatolo, P (2010). “Comorbidity of ADHD and Dyslexia”(PDF). Developmental Neuropsychology35 (5): 475–493. PMID 20721770doi:10.1080/87565641.2010.494748.
  38.  Fatemi, S. Hossein; Sartorius, Norman; Clayton, Paula J. (2008). The Medical Basis of Psychiatry (3 ed.). Springer Science & Business Media. p. 308. ISBN 978-1-59745-252-6Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  39. Capellini, Simone Aparecida (2007). Neuropsycholinguistic Perspectives on Dyslexia and Other Learning Disabilities. Nova Publishers. p. 94. ISBN 978-1-60021-537-7Archivedfrom the original on 9 January 2017.
  40. Moore, D. R. (July 2011). “The diagnosis and management of auditory processing disorder”. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch42 (3): 303–8. PMID 21757566doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0032).
  41. Pammer, Kristen (January 2014). “Brain mechanisms and reading remediation: more questions than answers.”Scientifica2014: 802741. PMC 3913493Freely accessiblePMID 24527259doi:10.1155/2014/802741.
  42.  Law, J (2014). “relationship of phonological ability, speech perception, and auditory perception in adults with dyslexia”Frontiers in Human Neuroscience8: 482. PMC 4078926Freely accessiblePMID 25071512doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00482.
  43. Susan J. Pickering (2012). “Chapter 2. Working Memory in Dyslexia”. In Alloway, Tracy Packiam; Gathercole, Susan E. Working Memory and Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-1-135-42134-2Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  44. Berkhan O (1917). “Über die Wortblindheit, ein Stammeln im Sprechen und Schreiben, ein Fehl im Lesen” [About word blindness, adyslalia of speech and writing, a weakness in reading]. Neurologisches Centralblatt (in German). 36: 914–27.
  45. Reid, Gavin; Fawcett, Angela; Manis, Frank; Siegel, Linda (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Dyslexia. SAGE Publications. p. 127. ISBN 978-1-84860-037-9Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  46.  Stein, John (2014). “Dyslexia: the Role of Vision and Visual Attention”Current Developmental Disorders Reports1 (4): 267–80. PMC 4203994Freely accessiblePMID 25346883doi:10.1007/s40474-014-0030-6.
  47. Whitaker, Harry A. (2010). Concise Encyclopedia of Brain and Language. Elsevier. p. 180. ISBN 978-0-08-096499-7Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  48. Price, cathy (16 August 2012). “A Review and Synthesis of the first 20 years of Pet and fMRI studies of heard Speech, Spoken Language and Reading”NeuroImage62 (2): 816–847. PMC 3398395Freely accessiblePMID 22584224doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062.
  49. Sharifi, S (May 2014). “Neuroimaging essentials in essential tremor: a systematic review.”Neuroimage Clinical5: 217–231. PMC 4110352Freely accessiblePMID 25068111doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.05.003.
  50. Brandler, William (February 2014). “The genetic relationship between handedness and neurodevelopmental disorders”Trends in molecular medicine20 (2): 83–90. PMC 3969300Freely accessiblePMID 24275328doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2013.10.008.
  51.  Cain, Kate (2010). Reading development and difficulties (1st ed.). TJ International. p. 134. ISBN 9781405151559. Retrieved 21 March 2015.
  52.  Levav, Itzhak (2009). Psychiatric and Behavioral Disorders in Israel: From Epidemiology to Mental health. Green Publishing. p. 52. ISBN 9789652294685. Retrieved 21 March 2015.
  53. Faust, Miriam (2012). The Handbook of the Neuropsychology of Language. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 941–43. ISBN 978-1-4443-3040-3Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  54. Benitez, A (November 2010). “Neurobiology and neurogenetics of dyslexia”. Neurology (in spanish)25 (9): 563–81. PMID 21093706doi:10.1016/j.nrl.2009.12.010.
  55.  Kere, Julia (September 2014). “The molecular genetics and neurobiology of developmental dyslexia as model of a complex phenotype”Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications452 (2): 236–43. PMID 25078623doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.102. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
  56. Marshall, Chloë R. (2012). Current Issues in Developmental Disorders. Psychology Press. pp. 53–56. ISBN 978-1-136-23067-7Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  57. Rosen, Glenn D. (2013). The Dyslexic Brain: New Pathways in Neuroscience Discovery. Psychology Press. p. 342. ISBN 1-134-81550-6Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  58.  Friend, A; Defries, J. C.; Olson, R. K. (November 2008). “Parental Education Moderates Genetic Influences on Reading Disability”Psychol. Sci19 (11): 1124–30. PMC 2605635Freely accessiblePMID 19076484doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02213.x.
  59.  Taylor, J.; Roehrig, A. D.; Hensler, B. Soden; Connor, C. M.; Schatschneider, C. (2010). “Teacher Quality Moderates the Genetic Effects on Early Reading”Science328 (5977): 512–4. Bibcode:2010Sci…328..512TPMC 2905841Freely accessiblePMID 20413504doi:10.1126/science.1186149.
  60.  Pennington, Bruce F.; McGrath, Lauren M.; Rosenberg, Jenni; Barnard, Holly; Smith, Shelley D.; Willcutt, Erik G.; Friend, Angela; Defries, John C.; Olson, Richard K. (January 2009). “Gene × Environment Interactions in Reading Disability and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder”Developmental Psychology45 (1): 77–89. PMC 2743891Freely accessiblePMID 19209992doi:10.1037/a0014549.
  61. Roth, Tania L.; Roth, Eric D.; Sweatt, J. David (September 2010). “Epigenetic regulation of genes in learning and memory”. Essays in Biochemistry48 (1): 263–74. PMID 20822498doi:10.1042/bse0480263.
  62. Pritchard SC, Coltheart M, Palethorpe S, Castles A; Coltheart; Palethorpe; Castles (October 2012). “Nonword reading: comparing dual-route cascaded and connectionist dual-process models with human data”. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform38 (5): 1268–88. PMID 22309087doi:10.1037/a0026703.
  63. Eysenck, Michael; Keane, Mark T. (2013). Cognitive Psychology 6e. Psychology Press. p. 373. ISBN 1-134-44046-4Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  64.  Eysenck, Michael; Keane, Mark T. (2013). Cognitive Psychology 6e. Psychology Press. p. 450. ISBN 1-134-44046-4Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  65. Hulme, Charles; Joshi, R. Malatesha; Snowling, Margaret J. (2012). Reading and Spelling: Development and Disorders. Routledge. p. 151. ISBN 978-1-136-49807-7Archivedfrom the original on 9 January 2017.
  66. Sprenger-Charolles,, Liliane (2011). “Prevalence and Reliability of Phonological, Surface, and Mixed Profiles in Dyslexia: A Review of Studies Conducted in Languages Varying in Orthographic Depth”Scientific studies of reading15 (6): 498–521. doi:10.1080/10888438.2010.524463Archived from the original on 30 August 2017.
  67. Bishop, D. V. M. (7 May 2015). “The interface between genetics and psychology: lessons from developmental dyslexia”Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences282 (1806): 20143139. PMC 4426619Freely accessiblePMID 25854887doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.3139.
  68. Schumacher, Johannes; Hoffmann, Per; Schmäl, Christine; Schulte‐Körne, Gerd; Nöthen, Markus M (2007). “Genetics of dyslexia: the evolving landscape”Journal of Medical Genetics44 (5): 289–297. PMC 2597981Freely accessiblePMID 17307837doi:10.1136/jmg.2006.046516.
  69. “Tests for Dyslexia and Learning Disabilities”. University of Michigan. Archived from the original on 13 March 2015. Retrieved 15 March 2015.
  70. Peer, Lindsay; Reid, Gavin (2013). Introduction to Dyslexia. Taylor & Francis. pp. 35–40. ISBN 978-1-135-37290-3Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  71. “Screening and assessment”British Dyslexia AssociationArchived from the original on 30 March 2015. Retrieved 11 March 2015.
  72. Fletcher, Jack (2009). “Dyslexia: the evolution of a scientific concept”Journal of international neuropsychology society15 (4): 501–508. PMC 3079378Freely accessiblePMID 19573267doi:10.1017/S1355617709090900.
  73. Verga, Laura (September 2013). “How relevant is social interaction in second language learning”Frontiers in Human Neuroscience7: 550. PMC 3759854Freely accessiblePMID 24027521doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00550.
  74.  Brandler, William M.; Paracchini, Silvia (2014). “The genetic relationship between handedness and neurodevelopmental disorders”Trends in Molecular Medicine20 (2): 83–90. PMC 3969300Freely accessiblePMID 24275328doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2013.10.008.
  75. Wilson, Stephen (March 2013). “Dysfunctional visual word form processing in progressive alexia”Brain136 (4): 1260–73. PMC 3613714Freely accessiblePMID 23471694doi:10.1093/brain/awt034Archived from the original on 7 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  76.  Johnson, Juliene (April 2013). “Jean-Martin Charcot’s role in the 19th century study of music aphasia”Brain136 (5): 1662–70. PMID 23576129doi:10.1093/brain/awt055Archived from the original on 7 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  77. Harley, Trevor (2014). The Psychology of Language: From Data to Theory (4th ed.). Psychology Press. p. 227. ISBN 9781317938439. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
  78. Wandell, Brian (January 2012). “Learning to See Words”Annual Review of Psychology63: 31–53. PMC 3228885Freely accessiblePMID 21801018doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100434.
  79. Vandermosten, Maaike (2012). “tractography study in dyslexia: neuroanatomic correlates of orthographic, phonological and speech processing”Brain135 (3): 935–948. PMID 22327793doi:10.1093/brain/awr363Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 4 March 2015.
  80. Ayers, Susan; Baum, Andrew; McManus, Chris; Newman, Stanton; Wallston, Kenneth; Weinman, John; West, Robert (2007). Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. Cambridge University Press. p. 689. ISBN 978-1-139-46526-7Archivedfrom the original on 9 January 2017.
  81. Heim, Stefan; Wehnelt, Anke; Grande, Marion; Huber, Walter; Amunts, Katrin (May 2013). “Effects of lexicality and word frequency on brain activation in dyslexic readers”. Brain and Language125 (2): 194–202. PMID 22230039doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.005.
  82. Mather, Nancy; Wendling, Barbara J. (2011). Essentials of Dyslexia Assessment and Intervention. John Wiley & Sons. p. 272. ISBN 978-1-118-15266-9Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  83. Beeson, Pélagie M.; Rising, Kindle; Kim, Esther S.; Rapcsak, Steven Z. (April 2010). “A Treatment Sequence for Phonological Alexia/Agraphia”Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research53 (2): 450–68. PMC 3522177Freely accessiblePMID 20360466doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0229).
  84. Tonkonogy, Joseph M.; Puente, Antonio E. (2009). Localization of Clinical Syndromes in Neuropsychology and Neuroscience. Springer Publishing Company. p. 409. ISBN 978-0-8261-1968-1Archived from the original on 29 April 2016.
  85. Leff, Alexander; Starrfelt, Randi (17 October 2013). Alexia: Diagnosis, Treatment and Theory. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9781447155294Archived from the original on 6 September 2015.
  86. Rapcsak, Steven Z.; Beeson, Pélagie M.; Henry, Maya L.; Leyden, Anne; Kim, Esther; Rising, Kindle; Andersen, Sarah; Cho, HyeSuk (1 January 2009). “Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates”Cortex45 (5): 575–91. PMC 2689874Freely accessiblePMID 18625494doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006. – via ScienceDirect (Subscription may be required or content may be available in libraries.)
  87. Ellis, Andrew W.; Young, Andrew W. (22 August 2013). Human Cognitive Neuropsychology (Classic Edition). Psychology Press. ISBN 9781135078478Archivedfrom the original on 6 September 2015.
  88. Yanoff, Myron (30 January 2014). Ophthalmic Diagnosis & Treatment. JP Medical Ltd. ISBN 9789350259528Archived from the original on 6 September 2015.
  89. “Visual Field Defects. Free Medical Information | Patient”PatientArchived from the original on 9 August 2015. Retrieved 23 August 2015.
  90. Brown, Thomas E. (2009). ADHD Comorbidities: Handbook for ADHD Complications in Children and Adults. American Psychiatric Pub. p. 236. ISBN 978-1-58562-158-3Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  91. Starrfelt, Randi; Ólafsdóttir, Rannveig Rós; Arendt, Ida-Marie (2013). “Rehabilitation of pure alexia: A review”Neuropsychological Rehabilitation23 (5): 755–79. PMC 3805423Freely accessiblePMID 23808895doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.809661.
  92. Hillis, Argye E. (2013). The Handbook of Adult Language Disorders. Psychology Press. p. 40. ISBN 1-134-94801-8Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  93. Papathanasiou, Ilias; Coppens, Patrick; Potagas, Constantin (2012). Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 168. ISBN 978-1-4496-8435-8Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  94. Boller, François; Grafman, Jordan (2010). Handbook of Neuropsychology: Disorders of visual behavior. Gulf Professional Publishing. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-444-50369-5Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  95. Schuett, Susanne (2009). “The rehabilitation of hemianopic dyslexia”. Nature Reviews Neurology5 (8): 427–37. PMID 19581901doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2009.97.
  96. Farah, Martha J.; Ratcliff, Graham (2013). The Neuropsychology of High-level Vision. Psychology Press. pp. 177–179. ISBN 978-1-135-80652-1Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  97. Comer, Ronald (2011). Psychology Around Us. RR Donnelley. p. 232. ISBN 978-0-471-38519-6.
  98. Jean-Michel, H (August 2012). “Synaesthesia, subjective expression of a neuronal palimpsest?”. Medicine Sciences28 (8–9): 765–771. doi:10.1051/medsci/2012288019.
  99. Bogon, Johanna; Finke, Kathrin; Stenneken, Prisca (16 October 2014). “TVA-based assessment of visual attentional functions in developmental dyslexia”Frontiers in Psychology5: 1172. PMC 4199262Freely accessiblePMID 25360129doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01172.
  100. Bogon, Johana (October 2014). “TVA based assessment of visual attention functions in developmental dyslexia”Frontiers in Psychology5: 1172. PMC 4199262Freely accessiblePMID 25360129doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01172.
  101. Brunswick, Nicola (10 April 2012). Supporting Dyslexic Adults in Higher Education and the Workplace. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 115–. ISBN 978-0-470-97479-7Archived from the original on 31 December 2013. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
  102. Schulte-Körne, G (October 2010). “The prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of dyslexia”Deutsches Ärzteblatt international107 (41): 718–26. PMC 2967798Freely accessiblePMID 21046003doi:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0718 (inactive 2017-08-15).
  103. Lyytinen, Heikki; Erskine, Jane; Aro, Mikko and Richardson, Ulla (2009). “Reading and reading disorders”. In Hoff, Erika. Blackwell Handbook of Language Development. Blackwell. pp. 454–474. ISBN 978-1-4051-9459-4Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  104. van der Leij, Aryan (1 November 2013). “Dyslexia and early intervention: what did we learn from the Dutch Dyslexia Programme?”. Dyslexia (Chichester, England)19 (4): 241–255. ISSN 1099-0909doi:10.1002/dys.1466.Subscription or libraries may be required
  105. Sawers, Paul. “Dyslexie: A typeface for dyslexics”Archived from the original on 13 April 2012. Retrieved 9 April 2012.
  106. Marinus, E; Mostard, M; Segers, E; Schubert, TM; Madelaine, A; Wheldall, K (August 2016). “A Special Font for People with Dyslexia: Does it Work and, if so, why?”. Dyslexia (Chichester, England)22 (3): 233–44. PMID 27194598doi:10.1002/dys.1527.
  107. Barquero, Laura (2014). “Neuroimaging of reading intervention”PLoS ONE9 (1): e83668. Bibcode:2014PLoSO…983668BPMC 3888398Freely accessiblePMID 24427278doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083668.
  108. Cogo-Moreira, Hugo; Andriolo, Régis B; Yazigi, Latife; Ploubidis, George B; Brandão de Ávila, Clara Regina; Mari, Jair J (15 August 2012). Music education for improving reading skills in children and adolescents with dyslexia. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009133.pub2.
  109. O’Hare, Anne (2010). “Dyslexia: what do paediatricians need to know?”Pediatrics and Child health20 (7): 338–343. doi:10.1016/j.paed.2010.04.004. Retrieved 11 March 2015.
  110. Hetzron, Robert (8 October 2013). The Semitic Languages. Routledge. ISBN 9781136115882Archived from the original on 6 September 2015.
  111. Tasman, Allan; Kay, Jerald; Lieberman, Jeffrey A.; First, Michael B.; Riba, Michelle (29 January 2015). Psychiatry, 2 Volume Set. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9781118845493Archived from the original on 6 September 2015.
  112. Protopapas, Athanassios (2013). “From temporal processing to developmental language disorders: mind the gap”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of LondonSeries B, Biological Sciences369 (1634): 20130090. PMC 3866431Freely accessiblePMID 24324245doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0090.
  113. Zhao, Jing (November 2014). “The visual magnocellular-dorsal dysfunction in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia impedes Chinese character recognition.”Scientific Reports4: 7068. Bibcode:2014NatSR…4E7068ZPMC 4238300Freely accessiblePMID 25412386doi:10.1038/srep07068.
  114. Marshall, Chloe (2012). Current Issues in Developmental Disorders. Psychology Press. p. 152. ISBN 978-1-84872-084-8Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  115. Garralda, Elena; Raynaud, Jean-Philippe (16 January 2012). Brain, Mind, and Developmental Psychopathology in Childhood. Jason Aronson. ISBN 9780765708663.
  116. Navas, Ana Luiza Gomes Pinto; Ferraz, Érica de Cássia; Borges, Juliana Postigo Amorina; Navas, Ana Luiza Gomes Pinto; Ferraz, Érica de Cássia; Borges, Juliana Postigo Amorina (2014). “Phonological processing deficits as a universal model for dyslexia: evidence from different orthographies”CoDAS26 (6): 509–519. PMID 25590915doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20142014135Archived from the original on 24 September 2015.
  117. Über Dyslexie” [About dyslexia]. Archiv für Psychiatrie15: 276–278. 1884.
  118. Annual of the Universal Medical Sciences and Analytical Index: A Yearly Report of the Progress of the General Sanitary Sciences Throughout the World. F. A. Davis Company. 1888. p. 39. Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  119. Brooks, Patricia (2014). Encyclopedia of language development. SAGE. p. 30. ISBN 9781483346434.
  120. Mishra, Srikanta K. (October 2014). “Medial efferent mechanisms in children with auditory processing disorders.”Frontiers in Human Neuroscience8: 860. PMC 4209830Freely accessiblePMID 25386132doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00860.
  121. Reid, Gavin (2012). The Routledge Companion to Dyslexia. Routledge. p. 16. ISBN 978-1-136-61710-2Archived from the original on 9 January 2017.
  122. Richlan, Fabio (May 2014). “Functional neuroanatomy of developmental dyslexia; the role of orthographic depth”Frontiers in Human Neuroscience8: 347. PMC 4033006Freely accessiblePMID 24904383doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00347.
  123. de Berr, J (2014). “Factors influencing work participation of adults with developmental dyslexia”BMC Public Health14: 77. PMC 3913008Freely accessiblePMID 24460949doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-77.
  124. Pino, Marco; Mortari, Luigina (1 November 2014). “The Inclusion of Students with Dyslexia in Higher Education: A Systematic Review Using Narrative Synthesis”Dyslexia (Chichester, England)20 (4): 346–369. PMC 4253321Freely accessiblePMID 25293652doi:10.1002/dys.1484.